Comparing AWS CloudFormation and Terraform: Choosing the Right IaC Tool
In today’s cloud-driven world, developers are constantly seeking efficient, secure, and reliable ways to deploy infrastructure for their applications. One of the most popular approaches is Infrastructure as Code (IaC), which allows developers to manage and provision infrastructure using code rather than manual processes. This article explores the concept of IaC, its advantages, and a detailed comparison of two leading tools: AWS CloudFormation and Terraform. By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of their features, differences, and which tool might best suit your needs.
What Is Infrastructure as Code?
At its core, Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is the practice of defining and provisioning infrastructure through code rather than traditional manual methods. It automates the process of creating, configuring, and managing infrastructure, ensuring consistency and efficiency.
Popular IaC tools include Terraform and AWS CloudFormation, which streamline the deployment process while offering unique features and capabilities.
These tools work similarly in that they:
- Define Desired State: Users create templates or configurations that describe the desired infrastructure.
- Calculate Actions: The tool determines the necessary steps to transition the current state to the desired state.
- Provision Resources: It executes the plan to deploy the infrastructure as defined in the configuration.
Benefits of IaC
- Rapid Deployment: Automate infrastructure provisioning, reducing deployment time.
- Consistency: Ensure uniform configurations across all environments.
- Cost Efficiency: Limit unused resources by automating cleanup processes.
With this foundation, let’s explore how AWS CloudFormation and Terraform compare.
What Is AWS CloudFormation?
AWS CloudFormation is Amazon’s native IaC tool, designed to help users define and manage their AWS resources using code.
With CloudFormation, developers create templates (written in JSON or YAML) that describe the architecture of an application or system. Once the templates are ready, they are used to create stacks, which represent the deployed infrastructure.
CloudFormation supports most AWS services out of the box, requiring no additional plugins or dependencies.
Users can interact with CloudFormation via the AWS Management Console, CLI, or API. This deep integration with AWS simplifies the process for those working exclusively within the AWS ecosystem.
What Is Terraform?
Terraform, created by HashiCorp, is an open-source IaC tool that enables users to build and manage infrastructure across multiple cloud platforms.
Unlike CloudFormation, Terraform is cloud-agnostic, supporting providers like AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and many others. It uses its own declarative language called HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL) to define infrastructure.
Terraform’s flexibility allows organizations to adopt a multi-cloud strategy, making it a popular choice for businesses that leverage resources across different cloud providers.
Additionally, Terraform configurations can be stored in version control systems, enabling collaborative development and robust change tracking.
Key Comparisons: AWS CloudFormation vs. Terraform
License and Support
AWS CloudFormation is free to use, with costs only associated with the AWS resources provisioned. On the other hand, Terraform is also free in its open-source form, but HashiCorp offers paid enterprise plans with additional features and support options for larger organizations.
State Management
Terraform maintains the state of your infrastructure in a state file, which can be stored locally or remotely (e.g., in an S3 bucket). This state file enables Terraform to track changes and support collaborative workflows by using version-controlled states. AWS CloudFormation doesn’t expose a separate state file; instead, it bundles all the resources into stacks managed internally by the CloudFormation service. This simplifies usage but offers less visibility into the state management process.
Modularity
Terraform excels in modularity. Its provider-based architecture allows users to incorporate resources from any supported cloud provider or third-party service. Terraform modules can be reused and shared, supporting a highly flexible and extensible approach.
AWS CloudFormation also supports modularity through nested stacks, which serve as reusable components for creating and managing common configurations. However, its scope is limited to AWS resources, making it less versatile for multi-cloud deployments.
Wait Conditions
When provisioning resources, there are scenarios where you may need to delay deployment until certain prerequisites are met (e.g., waiting for a script to finish execution). AWS CloudFormation supports wait conditions, offering more control over such dependencies. Terraform lacks a native equivalent, requiring users to implement workarounds.
Rollback Behavior
CloudFormation has robust rollback capabilities, automatically undoing changes if a deployment fails. This feature ensures that incomplete or problematic stacks don’t impact the stability of your infrastructure. Terraform doesn’t offer built-in rollback functionality, which can make error recovery more challenging.
Language and Syntax
AWS CloudFormation templates can be written in JSON or YAML, which are widely used and familiar to many developers. Terraform uses HCL (HashiCorp Configuration Language), which, while easy to learn, requires some initial effort for those unfamiliar with it.
Conditions and Loops
CloudFormation supports conditions, enabling developers to define actions based on specific criteria. For instance, resources can be included or excluded depending on environment-specific variables. Terraform achieves similar functionality using loops, which allow for iterative configuration of resources based on dynamic inputs.
Does Terraform Use CloudFormation?
No, Terraform interacts directly with AWS services through their APIs. It doesn’t rely on AWS CloudFormation and operates independently.
Which IaC Tool Is Right for You?
Choosing between AWS CloudFormation and Terraform depends on your specific needs and use case. Below, we’ve summarized the pros and cons of each tool:
AWS CloudFormation
Pros: Seamless integration with AWS, pre-built templates, supports JSON and YAML, robust rollback features, wait conditions, intuitive console experience with tools like CloudFormation Designer.
Cons: Limited to AWS resources, hard limit of 500 resources per template, dense documentation, challenging to manage changes made outside the stack.
Terraform
Pros: Cloud-agnostic, supports a multi-cloud strategy, open-source, modular design, version control for configurations, planning step for deployment validation.
Cons: No built-in rollback, requires learning HCL, debugging can be complex, reliance on state files (loss of state file impacts resource management).
Conclusion
AWS CloudFormation and Terraform are both powerful IaC tools, each with unique strengths and trade-offs. If you operate exclusively within AWS and value native integrations, CloudFormation is an excellent choice.
However, if you require flexibility, multi-cloud support, or plan to use third-party resources extensively, Terraform might be the better fit. Ultimately, the decision depends on your specific requirements, expertise, and long-term goals. By understanding the capabilities of each tool, you can confidently choose the best solution for your infrastructure needs.
Take Your Tech Career to the Next Level
On-demand Training — Ace your next cloud certification with our on-demand video courses and practice exams. Learn on your terms, and gain access to our extensive cloud training library with our monthly or yearly plans!
Cloud Mastery Bootcamp — Build job-ready cloud skills and unlock exciting cloud career opportunities with our live training program. Led by experienced instructors, you’ll develop hands-on experience with real-world projects in AWS, Linux, Python, Kubernetes and IaC!
